Title of the short film : Yaaro Oruvan
Director's name : Sandana Krishnan
Analysis :
Direction : Very good
Editing : Very good
Cinematography : Very good
Screenplay : Very good
Locations : Good
Playback music : Very good
Acting : Realistic
Appreciation :
The film about a poet is filmed with a poetic touch. The main actor's outstanding performance in his acting has brought out a special liking for this film among audience. The film seems like "Ram" , a tamil movie. The screenplay was excellent. The climax was emotional and thought provoking. With a ballet of technical crew , the director has sketched the success also while filming this story.
Verdict :
1. Re-recording is necessary in certain scenes like the scene in the printing press office.
2. Mouth non-sink in certain clips ( Re-recording error )
3. A mild flaw is seen in the base lead script that is a poet gets reknowned after his death but actually in the film , the poet dies after his poem is published in the magazine. It can be like his poems are recognized after his death by the magazine ( suggestion )
4. If " Kadavul Ilai " is a debate topic , fortunately his view has to be accepted. When the audience are able to accept and wonder , fortunately his view has to be accepted by at least one among the many. No problem , it is his fate and since he seems for others as a mentally retarded person , the director's view can be accepted.
Status : Good
Rating : 3 and half out of 5 stars
Bottom line : Seems like "Tamil M.A" movie
Director's name : Sandana Krishnan
Analysis :
Direction : Very good
Editing : Very good
Cinematography : Very good
Screenplay : Very good
Locations : Good
Playback music : Very good
Acting : Realistic
Appreciation :
The film about a poet is filmed with a poetic touch. The main actor's outstanding performance in his acting has brought out a special liking for this film among audience. The film seems like "Ram" , a tamil movie. The screenplay was excellent. The climax was emotional and thought provoking. With a ballet of technical crew , the director has sketched the success also while filming this story.
Verdict :
1. Re-recording is necessary in certain scenes like the scene in the printing press office.
2. Mouth non-sink in certain clips ( Re-recording error )
3. A mild flaw is seen in the base lead script that is a poet gets reknowned after his death but actually in the film , the poet dies after his poem is published in the magazine. It can be like his poems are recognized after his death by the magazine ( suggestion )
4. If " Kadavul Ilai " is a debate topic , fortunately his view has to be accepted. When the audience are able to accept and wonder , fortunately his view has to be accepted by at least one among the many. No problem , it is his fate and since he seems for others as a mentally retarded person , the director's view can be accepted.
Status : Good
Rating : 3 and half out of 5 stars
Bottom line : Seems like "Tamil M.A" movie